AdvertiseDonate
San DiegoChula VistaIrvineSanta AnaRiversideAnaheimLong BeachLos Angeles
Viral Coverage · 12544 High Bluff Drive, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92130
Tech · Tech

Meta Creates Nonvoting Shares to Shield Zuckerberg From California’s Wealth Tax

A new Class C stock structure allows the Meta CEO to sell equity to cover a potential $11 billion tax bill without surrendering his majority voting control.

By Lauren Bello ·

Illustration for: Meta Creates Nonvoting Shares to Shield Zuckerberg From California’s Wealth Tax
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

Meta is moving to insulate its founder from California’s proposed billionaire tax by engineering a new layer of ownership that lets him cash out assets without losing power. The tech giant revealed during its earnings call that the board has approved a new class of nonvoting stock, a move that directly addresses the financial threat posed by Proposition 40. This legislative measure, if passed by voters, would impose a one-time 5% wealth tax on hundreds of high-net-worth individuals residing in the state. The tension between state revenue goals and corporate retention strategies is now at the center of a complex financial maneuver designed to keep Mark Zuckerberg in charge while funding his tax obligations.

The numbers underlying this strategy are substantial. Meta estimates that Zuckerberg could face a tax liability of up to $11 billion under the proposed law. To manage this exposure, the company is introducing Class C common stock. Shareholders will receive one Class C share for every Class A or Class B share they currently hold. This one-time dividend effectively acts as a two-for-one stock split in terms of share count, but it does not alter the existing voting power of any shareholder. The new shares carry an economic stake in the company but grant no vote on corporate decisions, a distinction that is critical to the plan’s success.

The people driving this initiative are deeply invested in maintaining the status quo. According to reporting from The New York Times, Zuckerberg personally pressed the board to develop a protective plan. He reportedly told board members in September that if a consensus could not be reached, he would list his Palo Alto property for sale, a move that would have triggered significant media attention. The new stock structure materialized shortly after these discussions. An SEC filing documents that concerns regarding Proposition 40 were raised as early as July, with the topic resurfacing in meetings and communications throughout August. The filing explicitly states that the dividend is designed to allow Zuckerberg to sell or transfer up to 20% of his Class C shares. Because the dividend is one-for-one, this 20% cap represents 10% of his overall economic stake, enabling him to raise capital for the tax without affecting his majority voting control, which stands at approximately 60%.

The stakes extend beyond a single executive’s wallet. Meta’s leadership argues that keeping Zuckerberg in California is vital for the company’s direction, particularly regarding its AI initiatives. In a quote included in its earnings press release, the company stated that the Special Committee affirmed the importance of Zuckerberg continuing to lead from California. The rationale includes his need to remain in close coordination with management and in proximity to Meta Superintelligence Labs. The new shares are also intended for general capital raising, employee compensation, and acquisitions, but the tax mitigation aspect is a primary driver.

Proposition 40, drafted by Berkeley tax law professors and sponsored by SEIU United Healthcare Workers West, aims to generate up to $100 billion over five years. Backers propose using the bulk of this revenue for healthcare, with the remainder directed toward food assistance and education. The measure has already riled Silicon Valley’s elite. Google co-founder Sergey Brin has campaigned aggressively against it, spending significant personal funds to defeat the measure. Other business leaders have criticized the proposal online, warning that it could trigger capital flight and amount to economic suicide for the state. However, Meta’s approach suggests a different outcome: rather than leaving, the state’s biggest players are finding creative ways to pay the tax and stay put.

The political reaction highlights the high stakes of the upcoming vote. Democratic U.S. Representative Ro Khanna, a vocal proponent of the tax, responded to the news of Meta’s strategy on X. He noted that billionaires appear willing to stay and find ways to pay the tax. Khanna added that if Proposition 40 passes, the funds will ensure that underfunded California children have access to healthcare. The creation of Class C stock, which takes effect in January, signals that Meta is prepared to navigate the fiscal landscape of 2026 while maintaining the voting structure that favors its CEO.

More Tech · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get Viral Coverage in your inboxNews you can follow. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Get Viral Coverage in your inboxNews you can follow. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.